from move 40 it starts showing a draw.
lichess.org/study/COrKjuvI/OkqLrCN5
I found that stockfish even evaluates this position as giving white a big advantage, but so long as black doesn't capture one of the prisoners white can never checkmate black, and out of the pieces that can move black has an extra queen for a king and so is probably winning.
I found that stockfish even evaluates this position as giving white a big advantage, but so long as black doesn't capture one of the prisoners white can never checkmate black, and out of the pieces that can move black has an extra queen for a king and so is probably winning.
@acgusta2 said in #13:
> this position
WoW, not everyday will you find yourself in such a delicate tricky situation xD
> this position
WoW, not everyday will you find yourself in such a delicate tricky situation xD
a man vs machine chess analysis in a nutshell!
ps. i wonder why lichess forces HCE analysis in such positions instead of NNUE.. would be fun to give a neural network chance of evaluating it as well!
ps. i wonder why lichess forces HCE analysis in such positions instead of NNUE.. would be fun to give a neural network chance of evaluating it as well!
The original position has fooled chess engines for decades
@WorthwhileConquest28 said in #4:
> Stockfish can't evaluate fortresses yet, so it thinks it is winning simply because it has more material.
>
> P.S. looks fun to get to this position against cheaters; they simply will not accept any draw offers because their engine evaluates the draw in their favor. Then when they time out... ;)
How the hell can Stockfish NOT evaluate this position correctly? Isn't it on version 15/14 NNUE already?
> Stockfish can't evaluate fortresses yet, so it thinks it is winning simply because it has more material.
>
> P.S. looks fun to get to this position against cheaters; they simply will not accept any draw offers because their engine evaluates the draw in their favor. Then when they time out... ;)
How the hell can Stockfish NOT evaluate this position correctly? Isn't it on version 15/14 NNUE already?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.