So ... this isn't really a game to be proud of, but Keres' adage held true: the game is won by the player who makes the second-to-last blunder.
I'd been reading Silman on endgames recently, especially on the possibilities of achieving unlikely draws/wins with opposite coloured bishops. So I had my eyes open, even when I'd apparently blown it by overseeing the consequences of my opponent's 53.e8=Q. He however oversaw the possibilities of my two passed pawns, and I found the winning move ... instructive stuff this, I'll start with my game losing blunder:
http://en.lichess.org/5UR8DQIT/black#103
I'd been reading Silman on endgames recently, especially on the possibilities of achieving unlikely draws/wins with opposite coloured bishops. So I had my eyes open, even when I'd apparently blown it by overseeing the consequences of my opponent's 53.e8=Q. He however oversaw the possibilities of my two passed pawns, and I found the winning move ... instructive stuff this, I'll start with my game losing blunder:
http://en.lichess.org/5UR8DQIT/black#103